After a Failed Compromise, Virginia Landowners Will Now Push for a Full Ban on Deer Hunting with Hounds

Final week the Virginia Board of Wildlife Assets voted towards adopting two proposed laws for hunters who use canines to hunt huge recreation. One Division of Wildlife Assets reg would have mandated the usage of GPS monitoring collars for all deer and bear canines. The opposite would have required hunters to make a “cheap effort” to forestall their canines from getting into a landowner’s property after receiving discover that they’re not welcome. 

That is the newest improvement in a decades-long culture clash in Virginia, the place deer looking with hounds is a wealthy custom. Throughout Virginia’s 2023 to 24 firearms season, 50 p.c of deer had been harvested with the help of canines. (The observe remains legal in just eight states, all Southern; the final state to ban it was Texas, in 1990.)

Virginia houndsmen say the proposed regulations that didn’t pass final week had been onerous and poorly written, and certainly nearly all of public feedback overwhelmingly opposed each measures. The Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance contends {that a} small group of unethical houndsmen and tetchy out-of-state transplants are giving the game a nasty rap. The most effective answer, argues VAHDA CEO and lobbyist Kirby Burch, is to ramp up coaching and enforcement by the conservation police power, which is understaffed.

Non-public property homeowners say the unwillingness of Virginia hound hunters (as houndsmen are known as there) to compromise is “maddening.” Different states have extra laws in place for hunters who run hounds, which vary from permits to GPS necessities. The one recourse that is still, says Virginia Property Rights Alliance spokesman and hunter Chris Patton, is for property-rights advocates to desert compromise efforts, too.

“Till this resolution by the DWR to not regulate [hunting deer and bear with dogs], we’ve all the time been of the thoughts that the best way to avoid wasting hound looking in Virginia was to manage it in a manner that protects property rights and allows this custom to proceed,” says Patton. “However with the hound foyer refusing even essentially the most gentle regulation and the DWR abandoning landowners by failing to manage hound looking in any respect, we’re left with no different choice than to name for a whole ban on looking deer and bear with hounds. It’s unhappy that it has to come back to this.”

What Houndsmen Say

At 37, Virginia hunter Andrew Pullen has run looking canines for deer, bear, turkey, and coyotes all his life. Pullen says he’s by no means had a grievance towards himself and his canines or a battle with neighboring property homeowners till final season. That’s when a person trespassed onto the parcel he was looking, Pullen says, and grabbed his German shorthaired pointer by the collar.

“He walked proper into the center of the [deer] drive and grabbed my canine and drug it away from me,” says Pullen, who’s the volunteer fireplace chief the place he lives in Kents Retailer, and a hearth captain in one other county. “I chased him down and confronted him, and he mainly mentioned, ‘You’re going to struggle me or shoot me however you’re not getting your canine.’ I mentioned, ‘You’re trespassing,’ and he mentioned, ‘I’m sick of canine looking.’ He was so fired up about canine looking that he was keen to trespass and steal from me.”

Finally Pullen had the benefit with power in numbers and was in a position to name a conservation officer, however the would-be thief wasn’t charged with trespassing. As an alternative, Pullen says the sport warden despatched each events on their manner.

“I mentioned, ‘Hey man, that is why we [hunters] get a nasty rap. We’ve 15 witnesses and proof [from my GPS track], cost this SOB.’ I used to be fairly annoyed about that,” says Pullen. “However I respect legislation enforcement and shook my head and walked away. 

“We reside in a small city that folks up North acknowledge they wish to retire to. They arrive right here, and purchase their little farmettes, and so they get pissed off about our lifestyle. You got 5 acres in the course of a whole bunch of acres of timber property and also you see an occasional canine and also you’re elevating hell. I get that, but in addition it’s the South … I like looking with my canines and I’ve gone above and past to be a respectful houndsmen. … Most hunters [who run dogs] are like me.”

Though Pullen grew up with beagles and hounds, he began breeding Llewellin setters for operating recreation like bear, deer, coyotes, and turkey as a result of, partially, he discovered they’re attentive at checking in with their handler. In contrast to hounds, that are bred to vary for miles, his setters and pointers return after just a few hundred yards. That’s one purpose Pullen will get calls from buddies everywhere in the area who like to hunt together with his canines.

“Round right here in case you’ve bought a Boone and Crockett deer you wish to get after throughout deer season, you name me,” says Pullen. Whereas some hunters could also be reluctant to run their hounds on 15- and 20-acre parcels which can be near roads and neighbors, his canines deal with nicely on smaller properties.

Learn Subsequent: Are Deer Dogs Really a Problem for Deer Hunting in the South?

Yearly, Pullen and his canines get an invitation to affix firemen, state troopers, and different first responders to deer hunt an enormous chunk of timber firm land. They normally shoot 15 to twenty does, prepare dinner a giant dinner, and make a day of it. So final yr, Pullen launched his GPS-collared canines on that property the place they’d permission to hunt. He may hear them barking on a monitor and monitored them on his Garmin GPS tracker.

“I allow them to run inside a pair hundred ft of the property line. They stopped barking, so that they’d ended the chase anyway, and I toned them to come back on again to me. I saved strolling and all the opposite canines got here to examine in apart from one. And I assumed, man, the place’s Tip at?”

Pullen’s Garmin display screen confirmed his greatest canine, a 4-year-old brown and white Llewellin, wandering aimlessly close by. Then his buddy noticed Tip in a creek.

“I set my shotgun down and ran as much as him. He simply regarded sick,” says Pullen. “I couldn’t determine it out. I laid him down and rubbed him head to toe, and located one little spot of blood. I lifted his hair up and located an entrance wound. I flipped him over and located the precise measurement exit wound. I picked him up on my shoulders and ran out of there.”

Pullen spent about $10,000 on the vet attempting to avoid wasting Tip from what he suspects was an air rifle pellet. Pullen’s group by no means heard a gunshot and he says his canines by no means crossed a property line in line with his Garmin monitor. Tip’s loss of life was, as Pullen places it, “financially and emotionally devastating” to his household. The person who Pullen says shot his canine was by no means charged. He has threatened different hunters and is a part of a militant neighborhood that discusses capturing and burying looking canines on social media. One man in that neighborhood, who Pullen says lives on his street, patrols his street frontage with a rifle and physique digital camera, ready for a canine looking the adjoining leased property to stray onto his. 

The day earlier than his canine was shot, Pullen says a photograph somebody had taken of him in his truck appeared on Fb with the caption, “Sport on, extra to come back.”

What Landowners Say

Just a few years in the past, Chris Patton, now 54, retired from the Marine Corps. After serving practically 30 years, most just lately within the Pentagon, he determined to make Virginia his dwelling. He bought 160 acres in Nottoway County in 2021, which turned out to be adjoining to one of many 1000’s of hunt golf equipment within the state. It was after he met his neighbor that he ended up getting concerned with the Virginia Property Rights Alliance.

​​“Quickly after closing, the subsequent door neighbor came to visit and launched himself and mentioned, ‘Hey I run the native hunt membership right here and also you’re going to see our canines in your farm.’ Not a ‘Would you thoughts if we run our canines in your farm, it’s been one thing we’ve been doing for a very long time,’ or ‘Would you entertain a lease or permission?’”

The scenario has escalated to the purpose that Patton says hunters intentionally launch their canines adjoining to his property (which is authorized) and on the general public street in entrance of his property, and forged their hounds onto his land.

“No less than as soon as per week, generally a number of instances per week, I get collared looking canines operating via my property,” says Patton, who notes that the firearms season runs via mid-November to early January. “Final deer season I had 25 completely different events the place collared looking canines had been operating via my farm. So completely each Saturday morning, each Sunday morning, normally Friday afternoons — so anytime a traditional man like me goes to be looking, you’ve bought hounds operating via your farm chasing the deer off.”

A bowhunter, muzzleloader, and occasional rifle hunter, Patton has additionally been working to enhance the habitat on his property. That features bedding areas for whitetails, brooding cowl for wild turkeys, and quail habitat. As a result of many houndsmen within the space run their canines year-round (it’s authorized to hunt coyotes and foxes with hounds 12 months a yr in Virginia), he says canines are nonetheless disturbing all of the wildlife on his property.

“It’s unbelievably maddening to see a hound canine trotting throughout your area with a useless fawn in its mouth,” says Patton. “I’m not describing issues which can be outlawed. All of that is fully authorized in Virginia. You’ve gotten completely no management over your personal property.”

Patton likes canines. He grew up looking quail over Brittanies and has owned canines all his life.

“There’s no anti-hunting factor right here. I don’t care in any respect that somebody makes use of a canine to hunt deer with. I don’t personally hunt that manner as a result of I don’t get pleasure from it, however I’ve no drawback with it. They only need to do it on a spot the place they’ve permission. That’s the whole lot of the dialogue. Do it the place you will have permission. Include your canines to lands the place you will have permission. If they might do this, we might have completely no drawback.”

The difficulty, Pattons says, is actually a Constitutional one. He cites the final line of the Fifth Amendment, which reads that “non-public property [shall not] be taken for public use, with out simply compensation.”

​​“I believe the one manner ahead for Virginia is to ban hound looking altogether,” says Patton, who is obvious that he doesn’t have a difficulty with horse-back mounted fox hunters. “They banned [hunting with hounds in other states] due to this. As a result of the hound hunters had been so overt of their trespassing and other people bought so sick of it, and there was no willingness to compromise, that they mentioned, ‘Alright screw it. We are able to’t do that anymore. Property rights are extra vital than some man’s pastime.’ Which is strictly what looking is, it’s a pastime.”

Public Assist for Deer Canines, by the Numbers

Burch, the CEO of the Virginia Looking Canine Alliance, factors to the excessive public opposition to the 2 laws that didn’t cross. Following the general public remark interval this spring, 61 p.c of commenters opposed the proposed GPS collar mandate for monitoring canines whereas simply 25 p.c supported it (the remaining feedback had been impartial or unrelated).

“The hound neighborhood agrees that about 99 p.c of all hunters now use GPS collars,” says Burch. “So it was not in opposition to having them. The opposition got here as a result of they’re not an ideal reply to something, as anybody who makes use of them repeatedly is aware of. You’ll be able to usually have a canine gone for 15 or 20 minutes, and that could possibly be 3 miles earlier than the collar updates. The transmission’s not good, you get every kind of various issues, and so they’re costly … which might forestall new hunters from getting into the game.” 

The dearth of assist for the “cheap effort” clause was even larger, with 80 p.c of commenters opposing it and about 12 p.c supporting it. The main opposition to the proposal was that it wasn’t enforceable and wouldn’t forestall looking canines on non-public property.

“The regulation they wrote had a lot of faults. There have been a lot of individuals on either side that didn’t prefer it. After I first noticed it, I about misplaced my thoughts,” says Patton. “However at its core, it required canine hunters to make cheap efforts to maintain their canines off posted non-public property as soon as they’ve been notified they aren’t presupposed to be there. That’s the lowest potential bar of frequent sense that we may impose and implement. If their canine is on non-public property and the landowner tells that canine proprietor ‘I are not looking for your canines on my property,’ then he would simply need to make an effort to maintain the canines off. And he would primarily get three strikes as a result of the primary time you notify, then he will get a second strike, and the third time is the time he may get a misdemeanor cost. I don’t know every other legislation the place you get to interrupt it 3 times and it’s solely incorrect on the third time. The opposite factor, it’s washed clear yearly. So each season, you [would get] three extra strikes. It wasn’t an ideal proposal, however at its core it was good in that it no less than would’ve set the bar for compliance.”

Burch says there would have been an excessive amount of onus on an sincere looking canine handler, who may find yourself being charged with against the law. 

“There are official complaints, as there are in any human endeavor. However we consider the overwhelming majority of hound hunters are each moral and authorized, and work onerous to be good neighbors,” says Burch. 

He additionally factors to the extraordinarily low fee of recreation legislation violations by houndsmen as proof that only a few vocal landowners have issues with looking canines. VAHDA tracks hunting violations and complaints from 2013 via 2022. 

“There have been 6,000 wildlife violations between January 2022 and January 2023 in Virginia. Of all of the summonses issued, solely 2.8 p.c had been issued associated to looking with canines,” says Burch. “We make up a bit greater than 60 p.c of the looking inhabitants, individuals who hunt with canines. And these statistics replicate chook canines, waterfowl canines, and retrievers occurring anyone’s lease to retrieve a duck.”

Patton says this proportion is so low as a result of most of his issues with hound looking stem from authorized conduct, and the few legal guidelines which can be on the books are primarily unenforceable. As an example, it’s unlawful to intentionally forged your canines on non-public property the place you don’t have permission. However that’s practically inconceivable to implement, says Patton, as a result of usually hunters can say they’re merely retrieving their canines, which is authorized.

“Regardless of what number of recreation wardens we’ve, all the sport wardens can do is stand there and admire the issue and say, ‘Mr. Patton, I perceive what is going on right here is incorrect, however there isn’t a regulation or legislation that I can implement to cease them.’”

Pullen has additionally taken subject with the best way some laws have been written, and whereas he’s keen to compromise, he doesn’t wish to agree with a regulation that’s not sensible.

“I perceive one hundred pc the place Chris [Patton] is coming from,” says Pullen, who sees Patton’s dispute as a beef between neighbors. “In Chris’ case it’s not incidental, they’re doing it on function. And clearly the canines are the instrument of people that maintain screwing with Chris. If I had individuals each Tuesday night time turning their foxhounds free on my property I’d be combating mad too … I’ve witnessed canine hunters pull as much as anyone’s property that they don’t have permission to be on and throw their canines over a fence. I’ve seen it. And I’ve advised the landowner, ‘I’ve bought them, name the sport warden.’ Sport warden will get there and he says, ‘I didn’t witness it, I want you to go to the Justice of the Peace and we’ll kind out the warrants.’ And what does the property proprietor say? ‘I don’t wish to go to the difficulty, I known as you to do it.’ … There are idiots who’ve canines. However I don’t need looking with canines taken from me.”

Pullen, Patton, and Burch all served on the Virginia DWR’s Hound-Hunters and Private Landowners Stakeholder Advisory Committee, and are acquainted with one another’s positions. (You’ll be able to learn their final report here.) The Virginia DWR didn’t reply to a request for touch upon this story.

Learn Subsequent: CJ Alexander Pleads Guilty to 14 Charges Related to Poaching Giant Ohio Buck

Because the spokesman for the VPRA, Patton isn’t inclined to tip his hand about what the subsequent steps towards a ban on looking with hounds seems like, however he says there’s recourse in all three branches of presidency. He additionally expects a lawsuit over the legality of the appropriate to retrieve to resurface. Final month, in a lawsuit introduced by a dairy farmer who has been vocal about property rights, the state supreme court docket upheld hunters’ Right to Retrieve their canines over a technicality associated to the shortage of a court docket transcript.

Within the meantime, looking canine advocates will proceed to work towards options which can be community-based somewhat than regulatory.

“I consider if the VDWR will get critical about working with these committees in areas the place there are variations between neighbors, between hunters and non-hunters, between varieties of hunters, I consider we are able to mainly cope with this for one more era,” says Burch, 77, who worries about extra pink tape, expense, and the altering panorama of looking with hounds as parcels get smaller and entry vanishes. “Folks chuckle at me. Oh you’re going out of enterprise in 5 years. I’ve heard that since 1990. It takes a willingness on the a part of a sportsman to get entangled and never go away it to different individuals.”